non-smokers die every day

“i smoke.  if this bothers anyone, i suggest you look around at the world in which we live and shut your fuckin’ mouth”

*****

i’m not a smoker, well a very occasional one, but i have come to hate the non-smoking lobby, ash and their worrying government influence particularly, in light of their occasional super-emotive bullshit and misrepresentation of the facts.  i’m getting pretty goddam sick of calls for government intervention every time someone somewhere (usually with an agenda) identifies a ‘problem’.  so, unusually, finding an article by neil rafferty of forest in a mainstream newspaper i thought i’d spread the word.  even if you hate those stinky wheezey smokers and their filthy smoking habits he makes a bloody good point about bans and prohibition.

*****  

i have never been a huge fan of cheeseburgers.  they’re not the healthiest food you can buy and, unless you’ve just arrived on planet earth, you may be aware of an obesity epidemic.  but i don’t really care about any of that.  the fact is, they’re just not my kind of food.  i like pies.

that said, i’ve got no problem with anyone else eating cheeseburgers.  if that’s what you’re into, then crack on.  as long as you know what you’re doing and you’re not bothering anyone else, what business is it of mine? 

i wouldn’t go around demanding fast food restaurants be banned from displaying the different types of burgers they have on sale, or that the burgers be sold from under the counter.  i wouldn’t demand those little cardboard burger cartons carry a picture of a swollen heart plucked from a recently deceased burger fan.  i wouldn’t demand that burger bars be forced to apply for a special “burger licence”, nor would i demand that an 18 certificate be slapped on all films that depict gratuitous burger eating.

similarly, if i called for bottles of chardonnay or martini to be sold in brown paper bags and carry a picture of a diseased liver, you’d probably advise me to take some time off, or have a few drinks.

when it comes to smoking tobacco, however, all of the above are either already happening or being seriously considered by our government.  apparently it wants to “protect children” – the classic excuse from those who want to take away your freedom.  don’t get me wrong, i’m all for protecting children, but not only will none of these measures actually do that, but those who say they will are lying through their teeth.

the reason they support all these measures is because they want to turn smokers, the vast majority of whom are normal, law-abiding people, into lepers.

it is all rather nasty of course, but scotland’s smokers are getting used to it.  it’s the rest of you i feel sorry for.  they are already trying to “denormalise” driving a car or going on holiday by plane.  they’ll soon be trying to do the same with drinking, cheeseburgers and, yes, even pies.  after that, how long before they denormalise the books and films you like? how long before they denormalise words and ideas?  how long before they denormalise you?

and by the way, while they’re doing this, rebellious teenagers will be finding new and innovative ways to get their hands on tobacco, and all because the adults keep telling them not to.  in case you’re wondering, the best way to prevent kids from smoking is to actually enforce the existing age limit, instead of just talking about it.

so if you want to team up with the denormalisers, the very best of luck to you.  but while you’re being re-programmed, the rest of us will be out in the beer garden with a drink, a fag and something with cheese on it.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

11 Responses to “non-smokers die every day”

  1. Oh, nice post! If you don’t smoke that’s pretty good. I somehow always pictured you as a smoker though.

    Funny you should post this, because I myself am currently trying to quit. You’re lucky that you aren’t bothered by the smoke, many of my non-smoker friends can’t stand the smell or being in a smoky room. Their argument is that why should they endure my habit, the stench, the impact that the smoke will have on their skin and lungs, etc., just because I want to indulge.

    Smokers are made to feel the leper though, aren’t they?
    I’m going to miss: having a fag with a drink. They go so well together. …(sigh) all this talk of cigs, now I want one. S

  2. And I love a bit of good sharp cheese with wine. And cheeseburgers. Yum. Hey at least red wine is good for you. I don’t see how the odd cheeseburger can be that bad for you either, unless that’s all you eat.

  3. i did try and warn you…

    to be honest i’m thinking of taking up the evil weed just to piss off those fucking prohibitionists. those ‘betters’ protecting my rights, looking after my health. not on my behalf obviously but since when has that mattered. i’m an individual with a brain in my fucking head and the ability to make a decision (not always the right one but still my own). i. want. people. to. stop. preaching. to. me. about. what’s. best. for. me.

    i’m a booze man. the occasional other. but mainly booze.

  4. haven’t you heard? everythings bad for you.

  5. agree entirely. nice video/quote too :)

    im surprised you didnt address the main crux of the anti-smoker argument which is the “secondary smoking”

  6. i’m not entirely convinced by the science of epidemiology and meta-analyses so it’s difficult to prove secondary smoke convincingly for either the pro- or anti- camps.

    but that’s neither here nor there for me. it’s more pointless law that somewhat misses the point.

    the article is less about relative risks of passive smoking and more to do with the attempted removal of individuals rights, even when any alleged risk to others is removed. i don’t like any bans or prohibitions (be it alcohol, dutch politicians films, pornography, jihadist websites whatever). they don’t work. they’re usually for all the wrong reasons.

    i dont smoke 99% of the time. i love booze all the time. i always fear that when this kind of public ‘consensus’ is being sought/forced that i’m next.

    history: liberalisation follows restrictions follows liberalisation follows restriction follows…..

  7. bill hicks is always worth a quote.

  8. The cheeseburger analogy doesn’t really work for me. If other people eat cheeseburgers, I don’t get fat. If other people smoke, I’m unwillingly stuck breathing their fumes and taking a similar, albeit smaller risk. Perhaps farting is a closer analogy, although nobody seems to die from that…

  9. colby: yeah the cheeseburger analogy’s not the best….

    the issue has gone beyond second hand smoke unfortunately (still not proven either way i might add) to prohibition. it’s moved beyond taking away a correctly or incorrectly perceived risk to removing the individuals right to do what they want without harming others.

    if in this modern age of information people still don’t know smoking’s bad for them they deserve their cancerous fate. i imagine everybody now knows that smoking carries certain risks over a length of time. there’s no need for an ever increasingly overprotective bloated state to be interfering in this.

    and like i’ve said before this almost moral preaching / law making will certainly move onto other areas, things you don’t like and in all likelihood things you do. but there’ll be no wheezy smokers to get our backs.

    thanks for yr comments.

  10. You just sound like another pissed off smoker to me. I agree that the cheeseburger analogy doesnt quite work…roughly 50,000 people die a year, just in America, from second hand smoke. No one dies from heart disease just because their friend ate a cheeseburger.

  11. i don’t smoke.

    unless on fire.

Leave a Reply